Guest, this browser only · 388 unread · 0 saved · pick a name · updated Oct 11, 6:10 am
Background. The role of postmastectomy chest-wall irradiation in patients with breast cancer classified as pN1 (with involvement of one to three axillary nodes) or pN0 (pathologically node negative) with additional risk factors is uncertain.
Methods. In this international, phase 3, randomized trial, we evaluated the omission of chest-wall irradiation in women with "intermediate-risk" breast cancer - defined as cancer that was stage pT1N1, pT2N1, or pT3N0 or stage pT2N0 with a histologic grade of 3, lymphovascular invasion, or both (tumor size: T1, ≤2 cm; T2, >2 cm to 5 cm; or T3, >5 cm) - that was treated with mastectomy, an axillary procedure, and systemic therapy. Patients were assigned to undergo chest-wall irradiation (40 to 50 Gy; the irradiation group) or not to undergo chest-wall irradiation (the no-irradiation group). The primary end point was overall survival, with 10 years of follow-up. Chest-wall recurrence, regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, causes of death, and radiation-related adverse events were also assessed.
Results. The intention-to-treat population included 808 patients in the irradiation group and 799 in the no-irradiation group. The median follow up was 9.6 years. Overall survival was 81.4% with chest-wall irradiation and 81.9% with no chest-wall irradiation according to 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (hazard ratio for death, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.30; P = 0.80). A total of 29 patients had a chest-wall recurrence - 9 (1.1%) in the irradiation group and 20 (2.5%) in the no-irradiation group (between-group difference, <2 percentage points; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.99). Disease-free survival was 76.2% in the irradiation group and 75.5% in the no-irradiation group (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18), and distant metastasis-free survival was 78.2% and 79.2%, respectively (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.31).
Conclusions. In this trial, chest-wall irradiation did not result in higher overall survival than no chest-wall irradiation among patients with intermediate-risk, early breast cancer treated with mastectomy and contemporary adjuvant systemic therapy. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others; SUPREMO ISRCTN Clinical Study Registry number, 61145589.).
A note or tag saves the article on its own.
Background. Icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide that selectively binds the interleukin-23 receptor, is under investigation for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Methods. We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving adults and adolescents (≥12 years of age) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, as defined by all the following: a total body-surface area of psoriasis involvement of at least 10%, a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of at least 12 (range, 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating a greater extent or severity of psoriasis), and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of at least 3 (range, 0 [clear skin] to 4 [severe disease]). Participants were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive icotrokinra at a dose of 200 mg once daily through week 24 or placebo through week 16 followed by transition to icotrokinra. The coprimary end points were an IGA 0/1 response (IGA score of 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline) and a PASI 90 response (≥90% reduction from baseline in the PASI score) at week 16.
Results. A total of 684 participants underwent randomization (456 to the icotrokinra group and 228 to the placebo group). At week 16, a total of 65% of the participants receiving icotrokinra and 8% of those receiving placebo had an IGA 0/1 response, and 50% and 4%, respectively, had a PASI 90 response (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Complete clearance of skin at week 16 was significantly more likely with icotrokinra than with placebo (IGA score of 0, 33% vs. 1%; PASI 100 response [100% reduction from baseline in the PASI score], 27% vs. <1%; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The percentage of participants with at least one adverse event through week 16 was 49% in each group; the most common adverse events in each group were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. The exposure-adjusted incidence of adverse events was consistent through week 24.
Conclusions. Selective blockade of the interleukin-23 receptor with the targeted oral peptide icotrokinra resulted in a significantly higher incidence of skin clearance at week 16 than placebo among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Longer-term data will provide a more complete understanding of the benefit-risk profile of icotrokinra. (Funded by Johnson & Johnson; ICONIC-LEAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06095115.)See also in NEJM Evidence: Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High‑Impact Sites.
A note or tag saves the article on its own.
Background. Orforglipron, a small-molecule, nonpeptide oral glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is being investigated as a treatment for obesity.
Methods. In this phase 3, multinational, randomized, double-blind trial, we examined the safety and efficacy of once-daily orforglipron at doses of 6 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg, as compared with placebo (assigned in a 3:3:3:4 ratio) as an adjunct to healthy diet and physical activity for 72 weeks. All the patients had obesity without diabetes mellitus. The primary end point was the percent change in body weight from baseline to week 72, as assessed according to the treatment-regimen estimand in the intention-to-treat population.
Results. A total of 3127 patients underwent randomization. The mean change in body weight from baseline to week 72 was -7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -6.8) with 6 mg of orforglipron, -8.4% (95% CI, -9.1 to -7.7) with 12 mg of orforglipron, and -11.2% (95% CI, -12.0 to -10.4) with 36 mg of orforglipron, as compared with -2.1% (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.4) with placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Among the patients in the orforglipron 36-mg group, 54.6% had a reduction of 10% or more, 36.0% had a reduction of 15% or more, and 18.4% had a reduction of 20% or more, as compared with 12.9%, 5.9%, and 2.8% of the patients, respectively, in the placebo group. Waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, triglyceride levels, and non-HDL cholesterol levels significantly improved with orforglipron treatment as compared with placebo. Adverse events resulted in treatment discontinuation in 5.3 to 10.3% of the patients in the orforglipron groups and in 2.7% of those in the placebo group. The most common adverse events with orforglipron were gastrointestinal effects, which were mostly mild to moderate.
Conclusions. In adults with obesity, 72-week treatment with orforglipron led to significantly greater reductions in body weight than placebo; the adverse-event profile was consistent with that of other GLP-1 receptor agonists. (Funded by Eli Lilly; ATTAIN-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05869903.).
A note or tag saves the article on its own.
Background. No vaccine is currently available for Lassa fever, a viral hemorrhagic disease that is estimated to cause thousands of deaths each year in western Africa. A replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-vectored vaccine encoding a Lassa virus (LASV) glycoprotein complex, rVSVΔG-LASV-GPC, has been developed, but data on its safety and immunogenicity are limited.
Methods. In this phase 1, double-blind trial conducted in the United States and Liberia, we randomly assigned healthy adults (18 to 50 years of age) to receive rVSVΔG-LASV-GPC or placebo intramuscularly. Participants received a single vaccine dose of 2×104 plaque-forming units (PFU), 2×105 PFU, 2×106 PFU, or 2×107 PFU or placebo or received two vaccine doses of 2×107 PFU or placebo, within a window of 6 to 20 weeks. The side-effect profile was assessed according to the incidence of solicited and unsolicited adverse events (primary end point). Because Lassa fever can cause sensorineural hearing loss, hearing acuity was measured before and after the injection. Secondary end points were levels of binding antibodies against LASV glycoprotein, neutralizing antibodies, and vaccine vector-derived viral RNA and PFU in plasma, urine, and saliva.
Results. A total of 114 adults were enrolled. No serious vaccine-related adverse events were reported. The vaccine caused minimal local reactions and dose-dependent, mild-to-severe early-onset systemic reactogenicity events that were transient. No hearing loss was detected. All doses induced robust long-lasting cellular and humoral (binding and neutralizing) responses that cross-reacted against common LASV lineages. No infectious vaccine virus particles were found in plasma, urine, or saliva.
Conclusions. The rVSVΔG-LASV-GPC vaccine resulted in transient local and systemic reactogenicity events but no hearing loss or serious adverse events. The vaccine had immunogenicity over a wide dose range in healthy adults in the United States and Liberia. (Funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04794218; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR2021106625781067.).
A note or tag saves the article on its own.
Background. HER2 gene mutations occur in 2 to 4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sevabertinib is an oral, reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown anti-HER2 activity in preclinical models.
Methods. We conducted an open-label, multicenter, multicohort, phase 1-2 study to evaluate sevabertinib at a twice-daily dose of 20 mg in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC. Three cohorts were defined according to previous therapy: cohort D comprised previously treated patients who had not received HER2-targeted therapy; cohort E, patients who had previously received HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates; and cohort F, patients who had not previously received treatment. The primary end point was an objective response, as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points were duration of response and progression-free survival.
Results. A total of 209 patients received sevabertinib (as of June 27, 2025, the data-cutoff date); the median duration of follow-up was 13.8 months in cohort D, 11.7 months in cohort E, and 9.9 months in cohort F. Among 81 patients in cohort D, an objective response was observed in 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53 to 75); the median duration of response was 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 13.5), and the median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 12.3). Among 55 patients in cohort E, an objective response was observed in 38% (95% CI, 25 to 52); the median duration of response was 8.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months. Among 73 patients in cohort F, an objective response was observed in 71% (95% CI, 59 to 81), and the median duration of response was 11.0 months; data on progression-free survival were immature. Grade 3 or higher drug-related adverse events occurred in 31% of the patients. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (in 84 to 91%), with diarrhea of grade 3 or higher occurring in 5 to 23%. Treatment was discontinued by 3% of the patients owing to drug-related adverse events.
Conclusions. Sevabertinib showed antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-mutant NSCLC. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event. (Funded by Bayer; SOHO-01 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05099172.).
A note or tag saves the article on its own.