NEJM original articles

Background. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response and event-free survival in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 3 trial. Data are needed on overall survival.

Methods. In this open-label, phase 3 trial, patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for three cycles, followed by surgery. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response. Here, we report the results of the planned analysis of overall survival.

Results. A total of 358 patients were concurrently assigned to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy (179 patients) or chemotherapy alone (179 patients). The final analysis of overall survival significantly favored neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.523 to 0.998; P = 0.048). At a median follow-up of 68.4 months, the 5-year overall survival was 65.4% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 55.0% with chemotherapy alone, with consistency across most subgroups. In exploratory analyses, the 5-year overall survival in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group was 95.3% (95% CI, 82.7 to 98.8) among the patients with a pathological complete response and 55.7% (95% CI, 46.9 to 63.7) among those without such a response; survival was 75.0% among the patients with presurgery clearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and 52.6% among those without such clearance. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions. Three cycles of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival among patients with resectable NSCLC as compared with chemotherapy alone. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 816 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02998528.).

Background. Women receiving endocrine therapy for hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer or its prevention among those at high risk for breast cancer commonly have vasomotor symptoms. Data are lacking on the effects of elinzanetant, a neurokinin-targeted therapy shown to be effective in treating vasomotor symptoms, in this population.

Methods. We performed a phase 3 trial involving women 18 to 70 years of age with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with endocrine therapy for HR-positive breast cancer or its prevention. Women were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-daily elinzanetant at a dose of 120 mg for 52 weeks or once-daily placebo for 12 weeks followed by once-daily elinzanetant at a dose of 120 mg for 40 weeks. The primary end points were the change in the mean daily frequency of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline to week 4 and to week 12.

Results. A total of 316 participants were assigned to the elinzanetant group and 158 to the placebo-elinzanetant group. At baseline, the mean daily frequency of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms was 11.4 episodes (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7 to 12.2) in the elinzanetant group and 11.5 episodes (95% CI, 10.5 to 12.5) in the placebo-elinzanetant group. At week 4, the mean change from baseline in the mean daily frequency of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms was -6.5 episodes (95% CI, -7.2 to -5.8) among those who were receiving elinzanetant and -3.0 episodes (95% CI, -3.9 to -2.2) among those who were receiving placebo (least-squares mean difference, -3.5 episodes; 95% CI, -4.4 to -2.6; P<0.001). At week 12, the mean change was -7.8 episodes (95% CI, -8.5 to -7.1) among those receiving elinzanetant and -4.2 episodes (95% CI, -5.2 to -3.2) among those receiving placebo (least-squares mean difference, -3.4 episodes; 95% CI, -4.2 to -2.5; P<0.001). During weeks 1 through 12, a total of 220 participants (69.8%) receiving elinzanetant and 98 (62.0%) receiving placebo reported at least one adverse event that occurred while receiving elinzanetant or placebo, with the most common being headache, fatigue, and somnolence. Serious adverse events occurred during weeks 1 through 12 in 8 participants (2.5%) receiving elinzanetant and 1 participant (0.6%) receiving placebo.

Conclusions. Elinzanetant led to a significantly lower frequency of vasomotor symptoms associated with endocrine therapy than placebo. (Funded by Bayer; OASIS-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05587296.).

Background. Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP) is a rare disease characterized by progressive surfactant accumulation and hypoxemia caused by autoantibodies against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which alveolar macrophages require to clear surfactant. Molgramostim is a formulation of inhaled recombinant human GM-CSF, but its efficacy and safety in patients with aPAP have not been studied sufficiently.

Methods. In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with aPAP to receive molgramostim at a dose of 300 μg or placebo once daily for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 24 in the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), which was adjusted for hemoglobin concentration and expressed as a percentage of the predicted value. Secondary end points adjusted for multiplicity were the change from baseline in DLCO at 48 weeks and the change from baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total (SGRQ-T) and activity (SGRQ-A) scores (scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better quality of life) and in exercise capacity at 24 and 48 weeks.

Results. A total of 164 patients underwent randomization: 81 were assigned to receive molgramostim and 83 to receive placebo. The least-squares mean change in DLCO from baseline to week 24 was 9.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3 to 12.3) with molgramostim and 3.8 percentage points (95% CI, 1.4 to 6.3) with placebo (estimated treatment difference, 6.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.5 to 9.4; P<0.001). The least-squares mean change in DLCO from baseline to week 48 was 11.6 percentage points (95% CI, 8.7 to 14.5) with molgramostim and 4.7 percentage points (95% CI, 1.8 to 7.6) with placebo (P<0.001), and the least-squares mean change in the SGRQ-T score at week 24 was -11.5 points (95% CI, -15.0 to -8.0) and -4.9 points (95% CI, -8.3 to -1.5), respectively (P = 0.007). No significant between-group difference in the change in SGRQ-A score was observed at 24 weeks, so no statistical inference was drawn with respect to subsequent secondary end points. The percentage of patients with at least one adverse event and the percentage with at least one serious adverse event were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions. Once-daily inhaled molgramostim led to a greater increase in pulmonary gas transfer than placebo in patients with aPAP. (Funded by Savara; IMPALA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04544293; European Union Clinical Trials Information System number, 2024-511052-41-00.).

Background. Patients who have cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma with high-risk features are at risk for recurrence after definitive local therapy. The benefit of systemic adjuvant therapy options has not been well established in clinical trials.

Methods. In a phase 3, randomized trial, we enrolled patients with local or regional cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, after surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy, at high risk for recurrence owing to nodal features (extracapsular extension with largest node ≥20 mm in diameter or at least three involved nodes) or nonnodal features (in-transit metastases, T4 lesion [with bone invasion], perineural invasion, or locally recurrent tumor with ≥1 additional risk feature). Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjuvant cemiplimab (350 mg) or placebo, administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 12 weeks, followed by a dose increase to 700 mg administered every 6 weeks for up to 36 weeks (≤48 weeks total). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included freedom from locoregional recurrence, freedom from distant recurrence, and safety.

Results. A total of 415 patients were assigned to cemiplimab (209) or placebo (206). The median follow-up was 24 months. Cemiplimab was superior to placebo with respect to disease-free survival (24 vs. 65 events; hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.51; P<0.001). The estimated 24-month disease-free survival was 87.1% (95% CI, 80.3 to 91.6) with cemiplimab and 64.1% (95% CI, 55.9 to 71.1) with placebo. Cemiplimab led to lower risks of locoregional recurrence (9 events, vs. 40 with placebo; hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40) and distant recurrence (10 vs. 26 events; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.72). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 23.9% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 14.2% of those who received placebo; discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 9.8% and 1.5%, respectively.

Conclusions. Adjuvant cemiplimab therapy led to longer disease-free survival than placebo among patients at high risk for recurrence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; C-POST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03969004.).