NEJM original articles

Background. Current society guidelines recommend physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions to guide revascularization. Data regarding revascularization guided by vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR), derived from three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography without the need for a pressure wire or hyperemic agent, as compared with pressure-wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR), are lacking.

Methods. We conducted an international, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial at 37 sites in Europe. Patients with intermediate coronary-artery lesions (diameter stenosis of 30 to 80%) who presented with chronic or acute coronary syndromes were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either vFFR-guided or FFR-guided revascularization of the intermediate coronary-artery lesions. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization at 1 year. The noninferiority margin was 3.0 percentage points.

Results. The primary end point was assessed in 1116 patients in the vFFR group and 1095 in the FFR group. The mean age of the patients was 67 years, 24.3% were women, 18.7% presented with an acute coronary syndrome, and 26.6% had diabetes mellitus. At 1 year, a primary end-point event had occurred in 80 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 7.5%) in the vFFR group and in 79 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 7.5%) in the FFR group (risk difference, -0.02 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -2.25 to 2.21; P = 0.004 for noninferiority). The incidence of serious adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups.

Conclusions. Among patients with intermediate coronary lesions, vFFR-guided revascularization was noninferior to FFR-guided revascularization with respect to a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by Pie Medical Imaging and Siemens Healthineers; FAST III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04931771.).

Background. Adjuvant pembrolizumab improves disease-free and overall survival among patients with resected clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. The hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor belzutifan has activity in advanced disease. Adjuvant pembrolizumab with belzutifan may further improve outcomes in patients with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence.

Methods. In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous pembrolizumab at a dose of 400 mg every 6 weeks (≤9 doses) and either daily oral belzutifan at a dose of 120 mg (pembrolizumab-belzutifan) or placebo (pembrolizumab-placebo) for up to 1 year. The primary end point was disease-free survival as assessed by the investigator; secondary end points included overall survival and safety.

Results. A total of 921 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 920 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-placebo. The median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date (August 23, 2025) was 28.4 months (range, 15.0 to 40.1). Disease-free survival was significantly higher with pembrolizumab-belzutifan than with pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87; two-sided P<0.001); the estimated 24-month disease-free survival was 80.7% and 73.7%, respectively. At this interim analysis with 29% of the final-analysis events observed, overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.19; two-sided P = 0.24); the estimated 24-month overall survival was 96.2% with pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 95.7% with pembrolizumab-placebo. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 52.1% of the participants who received pembrolizumab-belzutifan and in 30.2% of those who received pembrolizumab-placebo.

Conclusions. Treatment with pembrolizumab-belzutifan led to significantly higher disease-free survival, with a greater risk of grade 3 or higher toxic effects, than treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy after nephrectomy in participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck [Rahway, NJ]; LITESPARK-022 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239728.).

Background. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are effective for relapsing multiple sclerosis. However, data from head-to-head trials are lacking.

Methods. In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned adults with newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis and recent disease activity in a 3:2 ratio to receive rituximab or ocrelizumab every 6 months for 24 months. The primary end point was the absence of new or enlarging lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from month 6 to month 24. Noninferiority was defined as a lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the risk difference (rituximab minus ocrelizumab) of greater than or equal to -10 percentage points. Secondary end points included efficacy and safety.

Results. A total of 218 participants underwent randomization; 216 received treatment (132 assigned to the rituximab group and 84 assigned to the ocrelizumab group). Between months 6 and 24, the estimated probability of having no new or enlarging lesions detected on T2-weighted MRI was 92.2% with rituximab and 94.8% with ocrelizumab, corresponding to a risk difference of -2.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -9.4 to 4.3), which met the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Relapse rates, disability outcomes, and cognitive-performance profiles appeared to be similar in the two groups. Infections were more common in the rituximab group than in the ocrelizumab group (in 82% vs. 69% of participants), although the percentage of participants with serious adverse events was similar in the two groups (8% and 7%, respectively).

Conclusions. In participants with newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis and recent disease activity, rituximab was noninferior to ocrelizumab in suppressing disease activity as detected by MRI from 6 to 24 months, with a similar incidence of serious adverse events. (Funded by the Research Council of Norway and others; OVERLORD-MS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04578639; EudraCT number, 2020-001205-23; EU Clinical Trials Register number, 2024-510716-71-00.).

Background. Assessing intermediate coronary lesions with an intracoronary pressure wire improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, clinical use of pressure-wire-based physiological assessment remains low. Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary angiographic images alone correlates well with pressure-wire-based FFR measurements and may simplify procedures, but its effect on clinical outcomes is unknown.

Methods. In this international noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing coronary angiography who were found to have at least one intermediate coronary stenosis to physiological assessment with measurements derived from angiographic images (FFRangio) or with pressure-wire-based measurements. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned, clinically indicated coronary revascularization at 1 year. The noninferiority margin was 3.5 percentage points.

Results. A total of 1930 patients were randomly assigned to physiological assessment with FFRangio (FFRangio group; 965 patients) or a pressure-wire-based approach (pressure-wire group; 965 patients). The mean age of the patients was 68.4 years, and 25.0% of the patients were women. At 1 year, a primary end-point event had occurred in 64 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.9%) in the FFRangio group and 65 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 7.1%) in the pressure-wire group (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 1.39; difference, -0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval, 2.1 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority). There were no apparent differences between the groups with respect to the incidence of bleeding, acute kidney injury, or procedure-related adverse events.

Conclusions. Among patients with intermediate coronary-artery lesions undergoing physiological assessment in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, an angiography-guided strategy involving FFRangio was noninferior to a pressure-wire-guided strategy with respect to a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned clinically indicated coronary revascularization at 1 year. (Funded by CathWorks; ALL-RISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05893498.).