NEJM original articles

Background. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with procedure-related stroke. Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce embolization to the cerebral circulation and hence the incidence of stroke.

Methods. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial across 33 centers in the United Kingdom. We randomly assigned 7635 participants with aortic stenosis in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVI with a CEP device (CEP group) or TAVI without a CEP device (control group). The primary outcome was stroke within 72 hours after TAVI or before discharge from the hospital (if discharge occurred sooner).

Results. A total of 3815 participants were assigned to the CEP group and 3820 to the control group. A primary-outcome event occurred in 81 of 3795 participants (2.1%) in the CEP group and in 82 of 3799 participants (2.2%) in the control group (difference, -0.02 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.68 to 0.63; P = 0.94). Disabling stroke occurred in 47 participants (1.2%) in the CEP group and in 53 (1.4%) in the control group. Death occurred in 29 participants (0.8%) in the CEP group and in 26 (0.7%) in the control group. Overall access-site complications appeared to be similar in the two groups (8.1% in the CEP group and 7.7% in the control group). A total of 24 serious adverse events occurred in 22 of 3798 participants (0.6%) in the CEP group, and 13 serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 3803 participants (0.3%) in the control group.

Conclusions. Among participants undergoing TAVI, routine use of CEP did not decrease the incidence of stroke within 72 hours. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and Boston Scientific; BHF PROTECT-TAVI ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN16665769.).

Background. In phase 2 trials involving patients with stage 2 or 3 fibrosis caused by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), efruxifermin, a bivalent fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogue, reduced fibrosis and resolved MASH. Data are needed on the efficacy and safety of efruxifermin in patients with compensated cirrhosis (stage 4 fibrosis) caused by MASH.

Methods. In this phase 2b, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we assigned patients with MASH who had biopsy-confirmed compensated cirrhosis (stage 4 fibrosis) to receive subcutaneous efruxifermin (at a dose of 28 mg or 50 mg once weekly) or placebo. The primary outcome was a reduction of at least one stage of fibrosis without worsening of MASH at week 36. Secondary outcomes included the same criterion at week 96.

Results. A total of 181 patients underwent randomization and received at least one dose of efruxifermin or placebo. Of these patients, liver biopsy was performed in 154 patients at 36 weeks and in 134 patients at 96 weeks. At 36 weeks, a reduction in fibrosis without worsening of MASH occurred in 8 of 61 patients (13%) in the placebo group, in 10 of 57 patients (18%) in the 28-mg efruxifermin group (difference from placebo after adjustment for stratification factors, 3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11 to 17; P = 0.62), and in 12 of 63 patients (19%) in the 50-mg efruxifermin group (difference from placebo, 4 percentage points; 95% CI, -10 to 18; P = 0.52). At week 96, a reduction in fibrosis without worsening of MASH occurred in 7 of 61 patients (11%) in the placebo group, in 12 of 57 patients (21%) in the 28-mg efruxifermin group (difference from placebo, 10 percentage points; 95% CI, -4 to 24), and in 18 of 63 patients (29%) in the 50-mg efruxifermin group (difference from placebo, 16 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 30). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with efruxifermin; most events were mild or moderate.

Conclusions. In patients with compensated cirrhosis caused by MASH, efruxifermin did not significantly reduce fibrosis at 36 weeks. (Funded by Akero Therapeutics; SYMMETRY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05039450.).

Background. First-line treatment with encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) with or without chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, an aggressive subtype with a poor prognosis, was compared with standard care (chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab) in an open-label, phase 3 trial, which showed significance regarding one of the two primary end points, objective response according to blinded independent central review (odds ratio for EC+mFOLFOX6 vs. standard care, 2.44; one-sided P<0.001). This result led to accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval of this investigational combination therapy for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, including as first-line therapy. Data on progression-free survival (the second primary end point) and an updated interim analysis of overall survival are now available.

Methods. We randomly assigned patients with untreated BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer to receive EC, EC+mFOLFOX6, or standard care. The two primary end points were objective response (reported previously) and progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review in the EC+mFOLFOX6 group and the standard-care group. The key secondary end point was overall survival.

Results. Significantly longer progression-free survival was seen with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 12.8 vs. 7.1 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.68; P<0.001). In an interim analysis, overall survival was significantly longer with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 30.3 vs. 15.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63; P<0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment was 46.1% with EC+mFOLFOX6 and 38.9% with standard care. Safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent.

Conclusions. This trial showed significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival with first-line treatment with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care among patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Pfizer and others; BREAKWATER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04607421.).

Four patients with infantile-onset Pompe's disease received a single intravenous injection of an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 vector carrying codon-optimized complementary DNA encoding human acid α-glucosidase (GAA) (dose, 1.2 × 10¹⁴ vector genomes per kilogram of body weight). One patient was withdrawn from the study and subsequently died. The other patients had improvement in cardiac outcomes and motor function over a 52-week observation period. Anti-GAA antibodies were not detected in any of the patients during the observation period. Respiratory tract infections were the most common adverse events. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding; Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2200063229.).